Unit 5 explores the areas of economic, social, and constitutional policy and the politics of neo-liberal governance in Canada. The recent Canadian experience with neo-liberal governance is contrasted with the past practice of Keynesian policy discourse. The themes of restructuring, regulation, and de-regulation are examined. The differences between the neo-liberal and Keynesian eras in terms of nation-building and the politics of consensus versus polarization are specifically highlighted. The meaning that each of these policy regimes holds for governance is examined.
The readings in this unit tackle the question of which constitutional form is best suited to neo-liberalism. In the Canadian case, the preferred option of neo-liberal policy-makers is a more decentralized federation, one that imposes constraints on the freedom of governments to intervene in the economy. In the realm of social policy, neo-liberals argue that the federal government should play less of a role in setting and regulating national standards in the areas of health, education, and welfare and allow the provinces wide scope for social policy experimentation. According to the Canadian neo-liberal approach, reinventing the welfare state in Canada—building a new social union—is to be done on a more decentralized basis (see Courchene 2001, chap. 6; Inwood 2000). It will also mean a “leaner and meaner” social policy order (see Russell 2000; Block et al. 1987).
When you have completed Unit 5, you should be able to achieve the following learning objectives.