Unit 3
North and South:
Channeling Information Flows
As we noted in Unit 2, a 1985 UNESCO study (see Mowlana, 1985) identifies
three main actors in international communications. The first two are the
state (as discussed in Unit 2) and multinational corporations or other
non-governmental organizations (such as RCA or ITT). The third group of
important players comprises the intergovernmental organizations that
operate in the regulatory, trade and legal spheres, including the International
Telecommunications Union (ITU), INTELSAT (which oversees the operation
of broadcast satellites) and the Organization for Economic Cooperation
and Development (OECD). These organizations facilitate the global exchange
of equipment, concepts, programs and techniques (and are strongly influenced
by the interests of the United States).
In the period leading up to the MacBride Commission, North-South conflicts
over the so-called "free flow of information" developed several
aspects. Concerns about economies and information systems were interlinked.
Against the American defense of the sanctity of unchecked flows of information,
the developing world demanded objective, balanced news, rather than the
biased versions of events they perceived in First World coverage. Calls
for a "New Information and Economic Order" (and variations on
this term) included international demands for a resolution to deal with
international media. A key principle, based on UN ideals, was that communication,
as a primary factor in cultural independence, also be recognized as crucial
to political independence.
In a comparative study of world broadcasting systems, communication theorist
Donald Browne (1989) considers geographical, economic, cultural and political
factors affecting individual and interconnected systems. Communications
policies, networks, ownership and regulations are necessarily shaped by
these factors. Politically, for example, it is relevant whether a nation
or region is run by a libertarian (capitalist), communist (centrally controlled),
mixed or authoritarian style of government. Governments of the latter
type have characterized many Latin American countries in this century.
|