Unit 16
Explanation and Archaeology
In this unit, we review the basic explanatory process of scientific anthropological archaeology, and examine a set of hypothetical models used to explain how states and civilizations evolved. We conclude with a short discussion of the future prospects for archaeological research.
Objectives
After completing this unit, you should be able to
- identify the three basic questions that archaeologists must answer, and the two levels of inquiry that they represent.
- briefly summarize Malthus’s theory of population growth, and explain why his contemporaries called it “dismal.”
- describe the factors that Boserup identifies as having caused agricultural systems in Asia to change.
- explain how “population growth” explanations differ from those based on carrying capacity.
- describe Wittfogel’s “hydraulic theory,” and explain why it has been criticized.
- explain how warfare can promote increased socio-political complexity.
- explain how trade and exchange lead to greater complexity.
- describe how technological innovations can spur socio-political change.
- distinguish between promotion and linearization as mechanisms of information flow through a society.
- distinguish between segregation and centralization.
- compare “prime mover” and “multiple factor” explanations and provide an example of each.
- explain what a systems-ecological model is, and describe the systems-ecological model for the evolution of Maya civilization.
- explain Bronowski’s view of how common sense and science are similar.
- compare the views of culture offered by Hodder and Rappaport.
- explain why archaeology today is at a crossroads.